Skip to main content

Instructor

Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library

Skill metadata​

SourceOptional — install with vibeos skills install official/mlops/instructor
Pathoptional-skills/mlops/instructor
Version1.0.0
AuthorOrchestra Research
LicenseMIT
Dependenciesinstructor, pydantic, openai, anthropic
Platformslinux, macos, windows
TagsPrompt Engineering, Instructor, Structured Output, Pydantic, Data Extraction, JSON Parsing, Type Safety, Validation, Streaming, OpenAI, Anthropic

Reference: full SKILL.md​

info

The following is the complete skill definition that VibeOS loads when this skill is triggered. This is what the agent sees as instructions when the skill is active.

Instructor: Structured LLM Outputs

When to Use This Skill​

Use Instructor when you need to:

  • Extract structured data from LLM responses reliably
  • Validate outputs against Pydantic schemas automatically
  • Retry failed extractions with automatic error handling
  • Parse complex JSON with type safety and validation
  • Stream partial results for real-time processing
  • Support multiple LLM providers with consistent API

GitHub Stars: 15,000+ | Battle-tested: 100,000+ developers

Installation​

# Base installation
pip install instructor

# With specific providers
pip install "instructor[anthropic]" # Anthropic Claude
pip install "instructor[openai]" # OpenAI
pip install "instructor[all]" # All providers

Quick Start​

Basic Example: Extract User Data​

import instructor
from pydantic import BaseModel
from anthropic import Anthropic

# Define output structure
class User(BaseModel):
name: str
age: int
email: str

# Create instructor client
client = instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic())

# Extract structured data
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "John Doe is 30 years old. His email is john@example.com"
}],
response_model=User
)

print(user.name) # "John Doe"
print(user.age) # 30
print(user.email) # "john@example.com"

With OpenAI​

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(OpenAI())

user = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
response_model=User,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract: Alice, 25, alice@email.com"}]
)

Core Concepts​

1. Response Models (Pydantic)​

Response models define the structure and validation rules for LLM outputs.

Basic Model​

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class Article(BaseModel):
title: str = Field(description="Article title")
author: str = Field(description="Author name")
word_count: int = Field(description="Number of words", gt=0)
tags: list[str] = Field(description="List of relevant tags")

article = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Analyze this article: [article text]"
}],
response_model=Article
)

Benefits:

  • Type safety with Python type hints
  • Automatic validation (word_count > 0)
  • Self-documenting with Field descriptions
  • IDE autocomplete support

Nested Models​

class Address(BaseModel):
street: str
city: str
country: str

class Person(BaseModel):
name: str
age: int
address: Address # Nested model

person = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "John lives at 123 Main St, Boston, USA"
}],
response_model=Person
)

print(person.address.city) # "Boston"

Optional Fields​

from typing import Optional

class Product(BaseModel):
name: str
price: float
discount: Optional[float] = None # Optional
description: str = Field(default="No description") # Default value

# LLM doesn't need to provide discount or description

Enums for Constraints​

from enum import Enum

class Sentiment(str, Enum):
POSITIVE = "positive"
NEGATIVE = "negative"
NEUTRAL = "neutral"

class Review(BaseModel):
text: str
sentiment: Sentiment # Only these 3 values allowed

review = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "This product is amazing!"
}],
response_model=Review
)

print(review.sentiment) # Sentiment.POSITIVE

2. Validation​

Pydantic validates LLM outputs automatically. If validation fails, Instructor retries.

Built-in Validators​

from pydantic import Field, EmailStr, HttpUrl

class Contact(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(min_length=2, max_length=100)
age: int = Field(ge=0, le=120) # 0 <= age <= 120
email: EmailStr # Validates email format
website: HttpUrl # Validates URL format

# If LLM provides invalid data, Instructor retries automatically

Custom Validators​

from pydantic import field_validator

class Event(BaseModel):
name: str
date: str
attendees: int

@field_validator('date')
def validate_date(cls, v):
"""Ensure date is in YYYY-MM-DD format."""
import re
if not re.match(r'\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}', v):
raise ValueError('Date must be YYYY-MM-DD format')
return v

@field_validator('attendees')
def validate_attendees(cls, v):
"""Ensure positive attendees."""
if v < 1:
raise ValueError('Must have at least 1 attendee')
return v

Model-Level Validation​

from pydantic import model_validator

class DateRange(BaseModel):
start_date: str
end_date: str

@model_validator(mode='after')
def check_dates(self):
"""Ensure end_date is after start_date."""
from datetime import datetime
start = datetime.strptime(self.start_date, '%Y-%m-%d')
end = datetime.strptime(self.end_date, '%Y-%m-%d')

if end < start:
raise ValueError('end_date must be after start_date')
return self

3. Automatic Retrying​

Instructor retries automatically when validation fails, providing error feedback to the LLM.

# Retries up to 3 times if validation fails
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Extract user from: John, age unknown"
}],
response_model=User,
max_retries=3 # Default is 3
)

# If age can't be extracted, Instructor tells the LLM:
# "Validation error: age - field required"
# LLM tries again with better extraction

How it works:

  1. LLM generates output
  2. Pydantic validates
  3. If invalid: Error message sent back to LLM
  4. LLM tries again with error feedback
  5. Repeats up to max_retries

4. Streaming​

Stream partial results for real-time processing.

Streaming Partial Objects​

from instructor import Partial

class Story(BaseModel):
title: str
content: str
tags: list[str]

# Stream partial updates as LLM generates
for partial_story in client.messages.create_partial(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Write a short sci-fi story"
}],
response_model=Story
):
print(f"Title: {partial_story.title}")
print(f"Content so far: {partial_story.content[:100]}...")
# Update UI in real-time

Streaming Iterables​

class Task(BaseModel):
title: str
priority: str

# Stream list items as they're generated
tasks = client.messages.create_iterable(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Generate 10 project tasks"
}],
response_model=Task
)

for task in tasks:
print(f"- {task.title} ({task.priority})")
# Process each task as it arrives

Provider Configuration​

Anthropic Claude​

import instructor
from anthropic import Anthropic

client = instructor.from_anthropic(
Anthropic(api_key="your-api-key")
)

# Use with Claude models
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=YourModel
)

OpenAI​

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(
OpenAI(api_key="your-api-key")
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o-mini",
response_model=YourModel,
messages=[...]
)

Local Models (Ollama)​

from openai import OpenAI

# Point to local Ollama server
client = instructor.from_openai(
OpenAI(
base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1",
api_key="ollama" # Required but ignored
),
mode=instructor.Mode.JSON
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="llama3.1",
response_model=YourModel,
messages=[...]
)

Common Patterns​

Pattern 1: Data Extraction from Text​

class CompanyInfo(BaseModel):
name: str
founded_year: int
industry: str
employees: int
headquarters: str

text = """
Tesla, Inc. was founded in 2003. It operates in the automotive and energy
industry with approximately 140,000 employees. The company is headquartered
in Austin, Texas.
"""

company = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Extract company information from: {text}"
}],
response_model=CompanyInfo
)

Pattern 2: Classification​

class Category(str, Enum):
TECHNOLOGY = "technology"
FINANCE = "finance"
HEALTHCARE = "healthcare"
EDUCATION = "education"
OTHER = "other"

class ArticleClassification(BaseModel):
category: Category
confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
keywords: list[str]

classification = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": "Classify this article: [article text]"
}],
response_model=ArticleClassification
)

Pattern 3: Multi-Entity Extraction​

class Person(BaseModel):
name: str
role: str

class Organization(BaseModel):
name: str
industry: str

class Entities(BaseModel):
people: list[Person]
organizations: list[Organization]
locations: list[str]

text = "Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, announced at the event in Cupertino..."

entities = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Extract all entities from: {text}"
}],
response_model=Entities
)

for person in entities.people:
print(f"{person.name} - {person.role}")

Pattern 4: Structured Analysis​

class SentimentAnalysis(BaseModel):
overall_sentiment: Sentiment
positive_aspects: list[str]
negative_aspects: list[str]
suggestions: list[str]
score: float = Field(ge=-1.0, le=1.0)

review = "The product works well but setup was confusing..."

analysis = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Analyze this review: {review}"
}],
response_model=SentimentAnalysis
)

Pattern 5: Batch Processing​

def extract_person(text: str) -> Person:
return client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Extract person from: {text}"
}],
response_model=Person
)

texts = [
"John Doe is a 30-year-old engineer",
"Jane Smith, 25, works in marketing",
"Bob Johnson, age 40, software developer"
]

people = [extract_person(text) for text in texts]

Advanced Features​

Union Types​

from typing import Union

class TextContent(BaseModel):
type: str = "text"
content: str

class ImageContent(BaseModel):
type: str = "image"
url: HttpUrl
caption: str

class Post(BaseModel):
title: str
content: Union[TextContent, ImageContent] # Either type

# LLM chooses appropriate type based on content

Dynamic Models​

from pydantic import create_model

# Create model at runtime
DynamicUser = create_model(
'User',
name=(str, ...),
age=(int, Field(ge=0)),
email=(EmailStr, ...)
)

user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=DynamicUser
)

Custom Modes​

# For providers without native structured outputs
client = instructor.from_anthropic(
Anthropic(),
mode=instructor.Mode.JSON # JSON mode
)

# Available modes:
# - Mode.ANTHROPIC_TOOLS (recommended for Claude)
# - Mode.JSON (fallback)
# - Mode.TOOLS (OpenAI tools)

Context Management​

# Single-use client
with instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic()) as client:
result = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=YourModel
)
# Client closed automatically

Error Handling​

Handling Validation Errors​

from pydantic import ValidationError

try:
user = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[...],
response_model=User,
max_retries=3
)
except ValidationError as e:
print(f"Failed after retries: {e}")
# Handle gracefully

except Exception as e:
print(f"API error: {e}")

Custom Error Messages​

class ValidatedUser(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(description="Full name, 2-100 characters")
age: int = Field(description="Age between 0 and 120", ge=0, le=120)
email: EmailStr = Field(description="Valid email address")

class Config:
# Custom error messages
json_schema_extra = {
"examples": [
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"email": "john@example.com"
}
]
}

Best Practices​

1. Clear Field Descriptions​

# ❌ Bad: Vague
class Product(BaseModel):
name: str
price: float

# ✅ Good: Descriptive
class Product(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(description="Product name from the text")
price: float = Field(description="Price in USD, without currency symbol")

2. Use Appropriate Validation​

# ✅ Good: Constrain values
class Rating(BaseModel):
score: int = Field(ge=1, le=5, description="Rating from 1 to 5 stars")
review: str = Field(min_length=10, description="Review text, at least 10 chars")

3. Provide Examples in Prompts​

messages = [{
"role": "user",
"content": """Extract person info from: "John, 30, engineer"

Example format:
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"occupation": "engineer"
}"""
}]

4. Use Enums for Fixed Categories​

# ✅ Good: Enum ensures valid values
class Status(str, Enum):
PENDING = "pending"
APPROVED = "approved"
REJECTED = "rejected"

class Application(BaseModel):
status: Status # LLM must choose from enum

5. Handle Missing Data Gracefully​

class PartialData(BaseModel):
required_field: str
optional_field: Optional[str] = None
default_field: str = "default_value"

# LLM only needs to provide required_field

Comparison to Alternatives​

FeatureInstructorManual JSONLangChainDSPy
Type Safety✅ Yes❌ No⚠️ Partial✅ Yes
Auto Validation✅ Yes❌ No❌ No⚠️ Limited
Auto Retry✅ Yes❌ No❌ No✅ Yes
Streaming✅ Yes❌ No✅ Yes❌ No
Multi-Provider✅ Yes⚠️ Manual✅ Yes✅ Yes
Learning CurveLowLowMediumHigh

When to choose Instructor:

  • Need structured, validated outputs
  • Want type safety and IDE support
  • Require automatic retries
  • Building data extraction systems

When to choose alternatives:

  • DSPy: Need prompt optimization
  • LangChain: Building complex chains
  • Manual: Simple, one-off extractions

Resources​

See Also​

  • references/validation.md - Advanced validation patterns
  • references/providers.md - Provider-specific configuration
  • references/examples.md - Real-world use cases